User talk:UtherSRG

This is UtherSRG's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9: 7 days

It is 1:22 PM where this user lives.

zOMG

		zOMG
		I, Hojimachong, hereby award UtherSRG A completely gratuitous zOMG barnstar, for being 110% awesome. Plus 1. --Hojimachong^talk

WikiProject Mammals Notice Board

In line with the recent upgrades to WikiProject Mammals a bulletin board has been created to keep all members up to date with the Project, consider it similar to the Wikipedia Signpost however focused on WikiProject Mammals. I would ask that you add this page to your watchlist in order to get the latest information about WikiProject Mammals. Kind Regards - Zoo Pro and The Arbiter^★_★^★

Happy holidays!

— mw (talk) (contribs) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Padshah UtherSRG 2024

You wrote "Since you can't explain in your own words, I see no reason to unblock you"

What own words? What do mean?

What questions should I answer You just decline the unblock request.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Homo sapiens History (talk • contribs)

Userpage

Hi.UtherSRG, can you please fully protect my userpage from creation because I think I no need to create our page due to they reflected from meta wiki as glibal userpage. Happy editing!--- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 12:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason to do this. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought fully protect level is very trustedable and anyone cannot edit fully protected userpage without any good reason, but I happy if you change protect level of creation of my userpage on here.Happy editing! --- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 13:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UtherSRG, Hello, today my user name has been changed from aviram7 to Bhairava7, and currently my user page unprotected from creation, so I humbly request you to please fully protect my user page from creation. WP:UPROT. Happy editing!Bhairava7 (talk) 11:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see, sounds good and thanks a lot for about that.Happy editing!--- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 12:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UtherSRG, sorry for distributing you but My alternative user account's userpage that you protected previously on my request but today my alternative account was also rename to as main account name, If you re-fully protect my alternative name if you feel comfortable,then please proceed my request.Happy editing!--- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 06:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of rollback

Here, you reverted my edit without any explanation using rollback. Why did you revert the edit at all, and which part of WP:ROLLBACKUSE did you think justified your use of the tool? csw99 07:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seemed like obvious vandalism to me, blanking a portion of the article. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible for a competent editor acting in good faith to think my edit was "obvious vandalism". And why have you mischaracterised it as "blanking a portion of the article"? That suggests you didn't bother to look at it when you reverted it or at any time since. csw99 07:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. And obviously editors since have agreed that my restoration of what you removed was correct. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to disagree with my edit. You are absolutely not welcome to describe it as vandalism. To do so requires either incompetence or bad faith. Which was it? csw99 06:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neither. I was correct. It was discussed in edit summaries. I see MPF has reverted you again. If you wish to revert to your version, please start a discussion on the article's talk page and get consensus. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Scott Foster (Engineer)

Hello kind person, thank you for fixing a few things on a draft I am working on. I have just submitted. Would you mind reviewing (and hopefully approving?) feedback welcome.

Draft:Scott Foster (engineer)

I am a PhD student in China - and this person came up in my research of energy efficient buildings and felt this person was deserving.

Kind regards,

W

Qetuadgjzcbm (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]